Build vs. buy, decided — not guessed

Build, buy, or both — know what each produces before you commit a dollar.

Independent analysis that treats your technology decision like capital allocation: grounded in your own systems, tradeoffs quantified, risks named out loud — one defensible verdict, not another vendor deck.

Apply for the design partner cohort
How a build vs. buy decision holds up over time
WITHOUT
TECHARBITER
One use case, in isolation
Short-term fix, no context
Advisor leaves
"Why did we build this?"
WITH
TECHARBITER
Centralized across departments
Context & justification kept
Similar & projected cases weighed
Reasoning on file
↻ Reused for the next decision
The structural gap

You inherited the debt. Not the reasoning.

By the time a build vs. buy question hits your desk, the people who made the last one are usually gone. What's left is the system, the invoice, and none of the why.

"

The renewal nobody can justify

A six-figure line item. No one left on staff can say what it replaced or what breaks if it's cancelled.

"

The tools that don't talk

Three departments each bought their own software. None of it connects, and no one owns the overlap.

"

The advice with a stake in it

Your only independent read comes from a consultant who earns more when you buy.

How it works

What you have, what you could have, what it would do.

01

Grounded in your org

Upload your stack, vendor proposals, and prior decisions. About an hour of your team's time, no kickoff call.

Your context, not a benchmark deck
02

Options analysis in 48 hours

Build, buy, and hybrid side by side: cost, timeline, integration fit, overlap with what you already own, and a confidence score on each.

A score, not a confident guess
03

Decision simulation, on request

See what a vendor option would actually produce for your business, built from public documentation. Not a live demo, and we say so.

Labeled by tier — see below
Output transparency

Every output tells you how much weight it carries.

We label the tier so you never mistake an estimate for a fact.

Architecture Model

Structural view

How an option fits your existing stack: dependencies, integration points, and where the seams are.

Capability Simulation

What it would likely do

An approximation of vendor functionality from public documentation, not a connected demo.

Structured Analysis

Cost, timeline, tradeoffs

The comparative numbers behind a recommendation, organized so you can interrogate them yourself.

Who it's for

Executives without an engineering bench to fall back on.

  • 01PE portfolio companies
  • 02Mid-market healthcare systems
  • 03Regional banks
  • 04Law firms
  • 05Retail & consumer brands
  • 06Professional services firms
Limited cohort

Become a design partner.

We're taking on a small number of design partners at a time-limited rate, in exchange for a straightforward value exchange.

One call. Thirty minutes. We decide together if the decision is worth arbitrating.

  • 01 A short case study on the decision we work through together
  • 02 A testimonial once the engagement wraps
  • 03 Permission to use your logo as a reference
  • 04 Availability for occasional reference calls
Design partner rate

Tell us about the decision on your desk

A few details so we can tell you quickly whether it's a fit.

Received.

We'll follow up within two business days to confirm fit for the current cohort.

Common questions

What you should know before we talk.

Advisory firms spend weeks on scheduling and template customization, not analysis. We start from your actual documents. Every conclusion is labeled by evidence strength, so you see which findings rest on hard data and where the gaps are.
Your existing stack details, the vendor proposals on the table, prior decision records, and the use case. Most of this is already in your data room. The intake form takes about an hour.
Your documents are used only for your analysis. They aren't shared, retained beyond the engagement, or used to train any models. We can sign your NDA before intake begins.
We don't replace them. We provide the independent second read their incentives won't allow. If we agree with their recommendation, you sign with confidence. If we don't, you find out before the money moves.
Yes. Intake covers your full stack, not just the tool in question. The analysis flags where contracts duplicate capabilities and where data isn't connected.
That's the common pattern. One company runs the analysis, the operating partner sees the output, and it becomes the standard process. Start with the decision that's live now.